[DOWNLOAD] "David H. Scoville and Alice Faye Scoville v. Springpark Homeowners Association" by Fifth District, Dallas Court of Appeals of Texas " eBook PDF Kindle ePub Free

📘 Read Now     📥 Download

eBook details

• Title: David H. Scoville and Alice Faye Scoville v. Springpark Homeowners Association
• Author : Fifth District, Dallas Court of Appeals of Texas
• Release Date : January 11, 1990
• Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
• Pages : * pages
• Size : 88 KB

Description

In this declaratory judgment action, the homeowner-appellants, David H. and Alice Faye Scoville, Billy G. and Ruth W. Hannah, Jim E. and Carla S. Brown, Arthur Ray, Jr. and Sherry Rhodes, Gary and Linda L. Pinkham, Gary L. and Nancy Meinershagen, James E. and Barbara R. Brogan, Alan P. and Jordanna P. Whitheiler, Jack and Kathryn Vincent, Robert A. and Kyoko O. Mallon, Richard F. and Mary K. Handley, Stephen L. and Gwen N. Hanni, Jerry L. and Mary Margaret Taylor, Charles Robert and Ruth Ellen Hewes, Arthur Ray, Jr. and Karon Collier, James G. and Linda Burkhart, James S. and Wanda J. Harrison, Lloyd G. and Sue K. Magee, Bertram C. and Francis B. Jones, Vernon Ran and Betty L. Swearingen, Gregory Bruce Pulcini, Joseph P. and Darlene Sircely, Aurelious A. and Diane Wiora, Jean F. Phipps Vielock, Rudy and Diana L. Melendez, Edward and Janet Sweda, Edward F. and Geraldine Kohlhaas, Larry L. and Marilyn L. Nulf, William Mendoza, Neal H. and Rita B. Ishman, Ramon Eugene and Janie Patricia Helms, Janet L. Walton, Bobby L. and Reva E. Smith, Neal P. and Evelyn L. Watts, Elton and Elisa Powers, Bruce R. and Sylvia K. Miller, Thomas C. and Deborah J. Connors, Kathleen V. Johnson, Paul R. and Tanya K. Engle, John M. and Carol A. Betty, Hui-Hsin Liu, Joseph C. Foster, Walter Y. and Grace Wen, John E. and Elizabeth H. Holderman, Robert and J. Leola Jolly, John H. and Donna L. Parker, Michael C. and Susan A. Bulkely, Richard D. and Rosemary J. DuMais, Robert E. and Nadine S. Lee, appeal from a summary judgment in favor of appellee, SpringPark Homeowners Association, Inc. Both the homeowners and the association filed motions for summary judgment. The trial court granted the associations motion and denied the homeowners motion. In their first and fifth points of error, the homeowners contend that the trial court erred in granting the associations motion and in denying the homeowners motion. We agree. The principal issue is whether the homeowners can vacate certain use restrictions binding their properties and thereby escape payment of assessments. We conclude that the homeowners can do so. We conclude further that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in the award of attorneys fees to David and Mary Ann Somers. Accordingly, we affirm the trial courts judgment insofar as it awards the Somers attorneys fees, and we reverse the remainder of the trial courts judgment and render judgment that the association take nothing against the homeowners.

Download Ebook "David H. Scoville and Alice Faye Scoville v. Springpark Homeowners Association" PDF ePub Kindle